‛Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a third State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority for the purpose of Common Position 2001/931’
JUDGMENT OF THE GENERAL COURT (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition) Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.Ĭommon foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a non-member State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931.ĭigital reports (Court Reports - general) Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition), 16 October 2014. In doing so, I show that the LTTE's military defeat is a direct consequence of Velupillai Prabhakaran's fixation with achieving the group's original aim - creating an independent Tamil Eelam homeland - through a military solution while largely discounting the political implications of changes in the conflict environment.Judgment of the General Court (Sixth Chamber, Extended Composition), 16 October 2014.#Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) v Council of the European Union.#Common foreign and security policy - Restrictive measures against certain persons and entities with a view to combating terrorism - Freezing of funds - Applicability of Regulation (EC) No 2580/2001 to situations of armed conflict - Possibility for an authority of a non-member State to be classified as a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931/CFSP - Factual basis of the decisions to freeze funds - Reference to terrorist acts - Need for a decision of a competent authority within the meaning of Common Position 2001/931.#Joined Cases T‑208/11 and T‑508/11. Towards this end, this paper applies a theory of warfare, the "revolutions in military affairs" (RMAs), as a framework within which to analyze the actions of the LTTE and the GoSL. This thesis aims to investigate the factors that led to demise of the LTTE during the final phase of the conflict, Eelam War IV. Yet despite its military prowess, the LTTE suffered a crushing military defeat by the Sri Lankan Armed Forces in May 2009. In addition to mastering guerrilla warfare, the LTTE fielded a formidable conventional force including a maritime arm capable of challenging the Sri Lankan Navy and a nascent air wing capable of striking targets inside government-held territory. For twenty-six years, the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) waged a protracted secessionist insurgency against the government of Sri Lanka (GoSL) with the aim of creating an independent homeland for the country's minority Sri Lankan Tamil population. Thesis (M.A.)-Georgetown University, 2011.
0 kommentar(er)
